Pursuant to a new Department of Labor (“DOL”) rule, employees in legal, same-sex marriages will soon have the same rights as employees in opposite-sex marriages to federally-protected job leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
The final rule changing existing policy under the FMLA will take effect on March 27. Currently, 37 states and Washington, D.C. recognize same-sex marriages.
The final rule changes the definition of a spouse under FMLA regulations from a “state of residence” rule to a “place of celebration” rule. In sum, if the place where the employee was married recognizes same-sex marriages as legal, the employee is entitled to take FMLA leave to care for his or her spouse or family member, regardless of where he or she currently resides.
In addition, the final rule expressly includes within the definition of spouse individuals in marriages that were validly-entered into outside of the United States, if they could have been entered into in at least one state.
All employers, including Michigan employers, must understand that available rights under the FMLA now extend to all eligible employees in same-sex and common-law marriages, regardless of the current status of Michigan’s (or the employer’s particular state’s) marriage laws.
In addition, employers should update their current FMLA policies to ensure they are congruent with the Final Rule prior to March 27, 2015.
- Partner
Courtney L. Nichols serves as the leader of Plunkett Cooney’s Litigation Department, and she is a member of the firm’s Labor & Employment Law Practice Group. Ms. Nichols also has the distinction of serving as a member of the Board ...
Add a comment
Topics
- Employment Liability
- Labor Law
- Employment Discrimination
- Employment Agreement
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Human Resources
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Wage & Hour
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- At Will Employment
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Minimum Wage
- National Labor Relations Act
- No Tax on Overtime
- Overtime
- Payroll
- COVID-19
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Coronavirus
- National Labor Relations Board
- Arbitration
- Noncompete Agreements
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Regulatory Law
- Civil Rights
- Title VII
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Contract Employees
- OSHA Issues
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Tax Law
- Retaliation
- Sick Leave
- Earned Sick Time
- Workplace Harassment
- Transgender Issues
- Contracts
- Unemployment Benefits
- Federal Trade Commission
- Civil Litigation
- Settlements
- Hostile Work Environment
- Business Risk Management
- ERISA
- Workers' Compensation
- Accommodations
- First Amendment
- Public Education
- Cannabis
- LGBTQ
- Class Actions
- Department of Justice
- Medicare Issues
- Sexual Harassment
- Garnishments
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- RICO
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Diversity
- Union Organizing & Relations
Recent Updates
- Federal Policy Favors Arbitration but Poor Drafting Derails Enforcement
- An Employers Guide to New OBBBA Overtime Reporting Requirements
- Federal Court Rules State Discrimination Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration
- Are Boilerplate Terms in Employment Applications Enforceable?
- Is Your Business Ready for Pay Transparency Laws?
- Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split in Reverse Discrimination Cases
- Michigan Legislature Avoids Chaos by Amending Earned Sick Time Act Just Prior to Deadline
- Implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Key Insights for Employers
- Federal Court Throws out DOL’s Attempt to Rewrite White Collar Overtime Rules
- Civil Rights Litigation Filed by Christian Employers Gets New Life Following Federal Appellate Court Ruling





