In City of N. Tonawando v. Penn Power Group, LLC, 77 CA 24-01685, 2026 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1800 (4th Dept. Mar. 20, 2026), the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Department (Appellate Court), considered whether the defendant’s motion to dismiss should be granted on the grounds that the breach of warranty was time-barred by the statute of limitations and the plaintiff’s negligence claims were barred by the economic loss doctrine (ELD). The Appellate Court agreed with the defendant that the breach of warranty claim was barred by the statute of limitations and that the ELD barred the plaintiff’s negligence claims.
With respect to the breach of warranty claim, the Appellate Court found that the defendant met its initial burden of establishing that the 4-year statute of limitations in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 2-725 had expired. The burden then shifted to the plaintiff to establish that the statute of limitations had not expired. The court found that the plaintiff failed to allege – beyond speculation and conjecture – that an express warranty of future performance was a made. Thus, the Appellate Court found that plaintiff failed to allege evidentiary facts showing that this case fell within an exception to the 4-year statute of limitations.
Considering the economic loss question, the court stated that pursuant to the ELD, “a plaintiff may not recover in tort against a manufacture for economic loss that is contractually based, whether due to injury to the product itself or consequential damages flowing therefrom.” In this case, the plaintiff alleged only economic loss arising out of damage to the product itself and consequential damages, i.e., damage to the truck and the truck’s replacement cost. The Appellate Court, therefore, found that the plaintiff’s negligence causes of action were barred by the ELD.
The case reminds subrogation professionals that, when in New York, they should consider not only the UCC’s statute of limitations for breach of warranty claims and whether an exception applies based on further performance. They should also consider the impact of the ELD on a subrogor’s negligence claims.
Recent Posts
Categories
- Products Liability
- Subrogation
- Experts – Daubert
- Construction Defects
- Experts - Reliability
- Contracts
- New Jersey
- CPSC Recalls
- Evidence
- Litigation
- Damages
- Texas
- AIA Contracts
- Negligence
- Arbitration
- Indiana
- Illinois
- Idaho
- Damages-Personal Property
- Louisiana
- Limitation of Liability
- Massachusetts
- Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Landlord-Tenant
- Sutton Doctrine
- Certificate of Merit
- Waiver of Subrogation
- California
- Uncategorized
- Colorado
- Jurisdiction
- Virginia
- Maryland
- Pennsylvania
- South Carolina
- Florida
- Indemnification
- Causation
- Condemnation
- CPSC Warning
- Minnesota
- Cargo - Transportation
- Malpractice
- Rhode Island
- Spoliation
- Tennessee
- Michigan
- Comparative-Contributory Negligence
- Contribution-Apportionment
- Product Liability
- Assignment
- Missouri
- Parties
- Public Policy
- Civil Procedure
- Res Judicata
- Damages – Personal Property
- West Virginia
- Wyoming
- Oklahoma
- Builder's Risk
- Contractual Subrogation
- Equitable Subrogation
- Georgia
- Insurable Interest
- Mississippi
- Made Whole
- Delaware
- Settlement
- Subrogation – Equitable
- Construction
- Premises Liability
- Joint or Several Liability
- Montana
- Duty
- Privity
- New Mexico
- Right to Repair Act
- Landlord
- Tenant
- Building Code
- Arizona
- Economic Loss Rule
- New York
- Statute of Limitations-Repose
- Warranty - UCC
Tags
- Products Liability
- Subrogation
- Construction Defects
- Experts
- Experts – Daubert
- New Jersey
- Waiver of Subrogation
- Construction Contracts
- Contracts
- Texas
- Daubert
- Failure to Warn
- Product Liability
- Evidence
- Damages
- Louisiana
- Indiana
- Experts - Reliability
- Illinois
- Arbitration
- Negligence
- Statute of Repose
- AIA Contract
- Idaho
- Loss of Use
- Vehicles
- Litigation
- Spoliation
- Landlord-Tenant
- Limitation of Liability
- Damages-Vehicles
- CPSC Recalls; Products Liability
- Statute of Limitations – Discovery Rule
- Architects-Engineers
- Massachusetts
- Circumstantial Evidence
- Mediation
- Certificate of Merit
- Contracts - Enforcement
- Amazon-eBay
- Oklahoma
- Cyber Subrogation
- Maryland
- Pennsylvania
- Georgia
- Indemnification
- Malfunction Theory
- Civil Procedure
- California
- Colorado
- Jurisdiction
- Jurisdiction - Personal
- Incorporation by Reference
- Virginia
- Florida
- Sutton Doctrine
- Economic Loss Rule
- Public Policy
- Gist of the Action
- Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Arizona
- Tennessee
- West Virginia
- Negligent Undertaking
- Statute of Limitations - Contractual
- Causation
- Delaware
- Improvement
- Negligence – Duty
- Apportionment
- Privity
- Condemnation
- Inverse Condemnation
- Statute of Limitations - Tolling
- Connecticut
- Minnesota
- Statute of Limitations - Accrual
- Design Defect
- Experts – Qualifications
- Malpractice
- Rhode Island
- Made Whole
- Expert Qualifications
- Amazon
- Settlement
- Evidence - Hearsay
- Michigan
- Comparative Fault
- Water Damage
- workers' compensation subrogation
- Contracts - Formation
- Condominiums
- Non-Party at Fault
- Warranty - Implied
- Malfunction Theory; Design Defect
- Independent Duty
- Ohio
- Wisconsin
- Unconscionable
- Missouri
- Parties
- Manufacturing Defect
- Pleading
- Removal
- Entire Controversy Doctrine
- Motion to Intervene
- Res Judicata
- Subrogation; High-Net-Worth; Damages; Art; Cargo-Transportation; Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Products Liability – Risk-Utility
- Lithium-ion battery
- Anti-Subrogation Rule; Wyoming; Landlord-Tenant; Sutton Doctrine
- Internet Sales
- Sanctions
- Spoliation – Fire Scene
- Builder’s Risk
- Contractual Subrogation
- Equitable Subrogation
- Exculpatory Clause
- Gross Negligence
- Insurable Interest
- Mississippi
- Standing
- Third Party
- Accepted Work
- Montana
- Independent Contractor
- New Mexico
- Res Ipsa
- Right to Repair Act
- Betterment
- Damages-Code Upgrades
- Statute of Limitations - Repose
- Washington
- Implied Warranty of Habitability
- Warranty - Construction
- Joint-Tortfeasors
- AIA Contracts
- Anti-Indemnity Statutes
- Forum-Venue
- Warranty – Express
- Products Liability - Foreseeability
- Cargo-Transportation
- Contribution
- MCS-90
- Substantial Completion
- Economic Loss Doctrine
- New York
- Statute of Limitations
Authors
Archives
- March 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
